Last month, Girl Scouts of the USA announced that its annual membership dues will jump from $25 per year to $65 by 2027.

News of the potential increase was distributed to voting delegates ahead of the virtual National Council session. General news outlets were not alerted until the week of the session.

The announcement came following the first virtual meeting of the National Council, the Girl Scout governing body. Delegates discussed a proposal to raise national dues to $85, the current cost of Boy Scout membership. After debate, the Girl Scout delegates compromised at $65. Adults will pay $30, beginning in 2026.

That when the alarm bells went off.

Fox Business emphasized that $85 would be a 240 percent leap.

Piggy Bank Jr
Junior House Whiz, 1980-1991

Girl Scout fees could soon triple in price. Members say the eye-popping number is out of reach for many families.

Vanessa Yurkevich, CNN

How will the new price affect the Girl Scout movement?

GSUSA–They Asked Us

The fact of GSUSA working through the democratic process in 2024 should not be minimized.

The last dues increase came in 2016, when the national board of directors voted to go from $15 to $25 per year.

Prior to 2016, all increases were authorized by delegates to the National Council, the national governing body that meets every three years (National Council Session/convention) and elects the board.

The GSUSA board’s unilateral move led one council, Farthest North in Alaska, to file a lawsuit that would invalidate the increase. The case was settled in 2021 and the terms are confidential. National dues remained $25 until the current change.

The ABCs of Dues

Girl Scout annual membership dues come in three flavors:

  • National dues (now $25) pay for program development, administration, insurance, properties–anything that affects all councils. CNN Business, reports that membership dues are the Girl Scout’s largest source of revenue, generating $38 million in 2023 from its nearly 2 million total members.
  • Council dues or “Service Fees” were approved at the 2011 National Council. They are also used on program development, staff, etc. but are confined to the council boundary. They are optional and cannot exceed the current National dues amount.
  • Troop dues, not surprisingly, stay within troops. Troop members vote on the cost and use the money for badges, supplies, and field trips.

Membership fees are not the sole sources of income. GSUSA receives funds for uniforms, handbooks, and badge sales, as well as product licensing. Both GSUSA and councils have funds from grants, endowments, events, and private donations. Councils and troops have cookie revenue, too.

Girl Scout Dues over Time

GSUSA has raised dues in the past, each and every time provoking objections, nasty-grams, and much pearl clasping.

Dues were first set at 25 cents in 1915. Founder Juliette Gordon Low could no longer run the growing movement out of her often overdrawn bank accounts. Outrage ensued when dues DOUBLED to 50 cents in 1922. That was still a bargain–Camp Fire charged $1 per year.

Rally (1915). Troop captains are now known as leaders.
1915 Dues with Border

GSUSA almost apologized when dues DOUBLED (from $1 to $2) in 1971. A two-page feature, “The Story of Membership Dues–Revisited,” in the December 1970 issue of Leader magazine:

Screenshot
Leader (December 1970): 15-16.

Boy Scout Dues over Time

I’d made my own Girl Scout dues chart for another project, so I added Boy Scout data on top of it.

Dues for both organizations remained consistently low and level for over a century.

Line graph with membership dues for Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts
Girl Scout and Boy Scout Membership Dues

The huge jump with the Boy Scouts began in 2017, when annual membership dues jumped from $25 to $33. Subsequent raises came in 2020 ($33 to $60), then to $66 one year later. Dues rose to $72 in 2021, then $85 earlier this year. (See detailed report on these matters by an economist.)

The popular Aaron on Scouting blog compiled a list of other popular after-school activities ahead of the 2017 increase. Boy Scouts look like a bargain in comparison:


Aaron on Scouting 2017
Aaron on Scouting 2017

In part to grow the number of members paying annual dues, in 2017-2018 girls were invited to join Cub Scouts. Boys and girls would be in separate troops, however.

The Boy Scouts needed the sudden dues increases for three reasons:

  • General Liability Insurance costs to protect volunteer leaders, staff, charter organizations, units, and youth.
  • Scouting America restructuring costs.
  • Enhanced Criminal Background check processes and investments in youth protection and safety programs.

The Boys Scouts filed for bankruptcy protection in February 2020, due to costs associated with some 80,000 claims for sexual abuse by adult Boy Scouts.

Because We’re Worth It.

To all who insist that parents won’t pay $65 for Girl Scouts, consider how many are already paying $20 more to enroll their children in Boy Scouts.

Remember also that the new $65 Girl Scout fee is only 76 percent of the Boy Scout dues.

Women still face a wage gap with men, earning only 84 cents for each male worker’s $1.

We can’t close the wage gap until families close the investment gap.

We must invest in girls today to have strong, confident, and brave women in the future.

Everything costs, including empowering girls. But Girl Scouts should not be the discount option for girls.

We want parents to sign their daughters up for Girl Scouts because the program is the best for girls–not the cheapest.

© 2026 Ann Robertson, writer, editor, Girl Scout historian, but NOT a Girl Scout employee.

8 responses to “Girl Scouts Raise Dues”

  1. 25 cents in October 1915, adjusted for inflation, is $7.74 today.
    2 dollars in September 1971, adjusted for inflation, is $15.47 today.
    25 dollars in 2016, adjusted for inflation, is $32.69 today.

    Girl Scout dues have always been historically low, and GSUSA has not done a good job explaining why they needed to increase them so much in the 21st Century beyond providing vague bullet points. I suspect this is because a lot of the costs go to the website infrastructure for registration, fall product, and cookie sales. I wish they would have provided more transparency on their tech and other operational costs and how that compares to past costs. What other things is GSUSA doing now that they didn’t do in the past? They mentioned things like the Daisy boxes but most seasoned leaders have no idea what’s even in them. This is another area where they need to be transparent. I’m a first year Daisy leader and have found the Daisy boxes to be hit-or-miss. Some activities are not developmentally appropriate. One box literally only had in it the lesson plans, plain white paper, pom-poms, dixie cups, and trefoil stamps. The thing that shocked me about the paper was that they used it as a substitute for the templates in the Daisy handbook!

    I also really hate the comparisons to other sports and activities. I have girls in my troop who only do girl scouts because that’s all their families can afford. Their families are choosing between food and gas, not travel basketball or competitive swimming.

    1. Transparency, is such a great word but not strong enough to address what I feel has been a miss management and redirection of funds to support what ever outcome GSUSA thinks that they need to go. There are so many areas they could decrees costs that are passed down to councils and weakens the volunteers ability to provide a good Girl Scouting program.

  2. Thank you for this, Ann. While it makes sense to me to compare Girl Scouts to Boy Scouts, I think we should emphasize the main reason their dues are high: their financial situation was created by a long history of sexual abuse in the organization, which they covered up until it was made widely known by the lawsuits. For that reason, comparing GSUSA to BSA makes less sense.

  3. Thank you Ann for providing this historical and comparative context. You only tangentially touch on the fact that families face participation costs beyond national membership dues – uniforms and potentially council and troop dues. When troops and councils deliver the vast majority of the programming it is hard to support such a huge increase at the national level. I would like to see some budget transparency from GSUSA. How much of the budget goes to essential record-keeping? How much is spent on nice to have services (such as volunteer essentials and the Daisy program boxes) and the frivolous – re-design of the membership pin?

  4. I only listened for nine hours, but what rang clearly in my head was when they said 24% of our membership is on financial assistance while the current registration is $25. This is not a good thing. I know, they promised if they get $65 there will be assistance. That is NOT in writing. Promises, promises, promises.

  5. 10:24
    Ms. Ann,….so increase all of our dues to pay for over inflated “empowering” women’s salaries;.what? I’m still completely ticked about this whole increase in membership fees. This nonprofit organization has mismanaged, misused millions of our membership fees for horrible IT, whatever “turnkey” stuff.
    …millions! And to pay for grossly inflated nonprofit salaries! To me, if the CEO and others want their 6 or 7 figure salaries, then go inyo the private sector. To me also, it woukd seem that if a person needs that $400K – 800K -1M salary, they have mismanaged their own savings to still want that amount. They should have had enough saved up and had it compounded for money / salary to no longer be their driving force. Yet, they’re the ones running the organization. I decent! This organization was to empower girls by providing experiences that they might never have had through Volunteer Leaders, who give so much of their time and own money for “the cause.”. The essence of Girl Scouts with what and will always be, will always be there without an increase in membership dues. It should not take millions and paying massive salaries to make this not-for-profit organization work.
    To me, the paid people up top, I feel, may have forgotten about this, living high and large. I have made this known to my paid
    Council and my paid workers that engage the Volunteer Leaders within my Community. I know other Volunteers feel the same way that I do, but don’t know how to oppose what was done to Us. This nonprofit organization belongs to Us, the Volunteer. The massively paid “leaders” are to streamline things; It seems like they have forgotten this. So We pay for their bad mistakes, overpriced building space, and massive salaries for my troop to be called Girl Scouts, when really, none if the badge work that we do amounts to anything leading to the highest awards.
    This organization has strayed so far off from what Juliette started it with and fostered it with along with the leaders that understand her vision. You even said so yourself that Juliette could no longer run the organization out of her overdrawn bank accounts….because it wasn’t about profit, it was about new girl experiences, getting/ learning/ and appreciating the outdoors, developing independence and independent thinking. Most all of that can be done on a very small budget. It doesn’t take a lot of money to empower a girl! Empowering is in attitude and showing them, “The Way!” Juliette, gave all! I don’t feel from these people up top that they are willing to give all! They won’t and that’s the difference.

  6. Ms. Ann,….so increase all of our dues to pay for over inflated “empowering” women’s salaries;.what? I’m still completely ticked about this whole increase in membership fees. This nonprofit organization has mismanaged, misused millions of our membership fees for horrible IT, whatever “turnkey” stuff.
    ….millions! And to pay for grossly inflated nonprofit salaries! To me, if the CEO and others want their 6 or 7 figure salaries, then go inyo the private sector. To me also, it woukd seem that if a person needs that $400K – 800K -1M salary, they have mismanaged their own savings to still want that amount. They should have had enough saved up and had it compounded for money / salary to no longer be their driving force. Yet, they’re the ones running the organization. I decent! This organization was to empower girls by providing experiences that they might never have had through Volunteer Leaders, who give so much of their time and own money for “the cause.”. The essence of Girl Scouts with what and will always be, will always be there without an increase in membership dues. It should not take millions and paying massive salaries to make this not-for-profit organization work.
    To me, the paid people up top, I feel, may have forgotten about this, living high and large. I have made this known to my paid
    Council and my paid workers that engage the Volunteer Leaders within my Community. I know other Volunteers feel the same way that I do, but don’t know how to oppose what was done to Us. This nonprofit organization belongs to Us, the Volunteer. The massively paid “leaders” are to streamline things; It seems like they have forgotten this. So We pay for their bad mistakes, overpriced building space, and massive salaries for my troop to be called Girl Scouts, when really, none if the badge work that we do amounts to anything leading to the highest awards.
    This organization has strayed so far off from what Juliette started it with and fostered it with along with the leaders that understand her vision. You even said so yourself that Juliette could no longer run the organization out of her overdrawn bank accounts….because it wasn’t about profit, it was about new girl experiences, getting/ learning/ and appreciating the outdoors, developing independence and independent thinking. Most all of that can be done on a very small budget. It doesn’t take a lot of money to empower a girl! Empowering is in attitude and showing them, “The Way!” Juliette, gave all! I don’t feel from these people up top that they are willing to give all! They won’t and that’s the difference.

  7. I appreciate your focus on the investment in scouting, but at the same time I’m heart stricken by the comparable value. The Boy Scouts have a massive amount of outdoor camps and many other resources the girls simply do not.

    The mid aughts restructuring by outside consultants & consolidation of councils vastly reduced the already scarce Girl Scout outdoor camp lands, my own treasured camp eagle island was divested by the council, and though it is now run as a nonprofit it is simply not the same, and should have remained with the scouts.

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Girl Scout History Project

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading